THE ORBITAL Tracking the emergent movement for planetary systems governance

Governance Library

Tools for Collective Decision-Making

A modular toolkit of governance systems — from voting methods and deliberation processes to resource allocation mechanisms and constitutional frameworks. Drawn from democratic innovation, commons research, indigenous practice, and digital-native experimentation.

These are building blocks. They can be combined, modified, and nested. The wisdom comes from knowing which tool fits which situation.

Voting & Election Systems

8 methods

Single Transferable Vote (STV)

Scale: Medium–large groups (20–500+) Use: Electing a multi-seat council

Voters rank candidates. A quota (Droop) determines the threshold to win a seat. Surplus votes and eliminated candidates' votes transfer according to preferences. Proportional representation emerges naturally.

→ Teaches coalition-building. Minority positions win representation.

Approval Voting

Scale: Any Use: Quick decisions with many options

Vote for as many candidates as you approve of. Most approvals wins.

→ Dead simple. No spoiler effect. Good for rapid field-narrowing.

Quadratic Voting

Scale: Medium groups (10–200) Use: Resource allocation, budget priorities

Each player gets a pool of voice credits. Spreading votes across issues or concentrating them — each additional vote on the same issue costs quadratically more. Reveals intensity of preference.

→ Forces trade-offs between breadth and depth of conviction.

Ranked-Choice / Instant Runoff

Scale: Any Use: Single-winner elections

Rank candidates. Lowest eliminated, votes transfer. Repeat until majority.

→ Simpler than STV for single-leader elections.

Score / Range Voting

Scale: Any Use: Rating proposals or candidates on a scale

Rate each option 0–5 (or 0–10). Highest average score wins.

→ Good for evaluating qualitative things — art proposals, mission priorities, trustworthiness.

Liquid Democracy / Delegative Voting

Scale: Any (especially ongoing governance) Use: Persistent representation with flexible delegation

Vote directly on any issue, or delegate your vote to someone you trust — who can further delegate. Delegation is revocable at any time.

→ Models real trust networks. Creates emergent leaders without formal elections.

Sortition (Random Selection)

Scale: Large groups Use: Forming citizen assemblies, juries, councils

Representatives are chosen by lottery from the eligible population.

→ Radically egalitarian. Removes campaigning entirely.

Conviction Voting

Scale: Medium–large, ongoing Use: Continuous funding allocation

You stake tokens on proposals over time. The longer you stake, the more "conviction" accumulates. Proposals pass when conviction crosses a threshold.

→ Rewards sustained commitment over hype.

Deliberation & Consensus

7 methods

Consent-Based Decision Making (Sociocracy)

Scale: Small–medium groups (3–30) Use: Policy decisions, working group governance

A proposal passes unless someone has a "paramount objection" — not "I prefer something else" but "this will cause harm." Objections are integrated into improved proposals.

→ Fast and inclusive. Teaches the difference between preference and objection.

Consensus Process (Formal)

Scale: Small–medium (5–40) Use: High-stakes decisions requiring full buy-in

Discussion → proposal → check for concerns → address concerns → check for blocks → consensus or stand-aside. Hand signals (thumbs up/sideways/down, or twinkle fingers).

→ The hand signals alone are powerful. People physically embody agreement.

Fist-to-Five

Scale: Any Use: Quick temperature check on a proposal

Everyone holds up 0–5 fingers. 5 = fully support, 3 = can live with it, 1 = serious concerns, 0 (fist) = block.

→ Instant, visual, no tech needed. Use before and after deliberation to show opinion shift.

Fishbowl Discussion

Scale: Medium–large (20–200) Use: Structured dialogue on contested issues

A small circle (4–6 chairs) discusses. Outer ring listens. One chair is always empty — anyone from the outer ring can sit in it to join, but then someone else must leave.

→ Beautiful spatial mechanic. Self-regulating. Prevents domination by loud voices.

Talking Circle / Council

Scale: Small–medium (5–30) Use: Deep listening, conflict resolution, ceremony

A talking piece passes around the circle. Only the holder speaks. No cross-talk, no rebuttals — only witnessing.

→ Indigenous governance wisdom. Slows everything down in the best way.

Deliberative Polling

Scale: Large (50–500+) Use: Informed collective opinion on complex issues

Poll → provide balanced briefing materials → facilitated small-group discussion → poll again. Measure opinion shift.

→ Shows how minds change with better information. The before/after data is powerful.

Open Space Technology

Scale: Medium–large (20–2000) Use: Self-organising conferences, agenda setting

No preset agenda. Participants propose sessions, post them on a wall, self-organize into groups. "Law of Two Feet" — if you're not learning or contributing, move on.

→ Already native to festival and unconference culture. Players set the day's agenda each morning.

Resource Allocation & Economics

5 methods

Participatory Budgeting

Scale: Medium–large Use: Deciding how to spend a shared pool

Community members propose projects, develop budgets, then vote on which get funded. Usually with a fixed pot.

→ Core Assemblies mechanic. A planetary council allocates resources across proposals.

Commons Management (Ostrom's Principles)

Scale: Any group sharing a resource Use: Managing shared resources without tragedy

Elinor Ostrom's 8 principles: clear boundaries, proportional costs/benefits, collective-choice arrangements, monitoring, graduated sanctions, conflict resolution, local autonomy, nested governance.

→ Players learn the principles by applying them to shared commons: water, energy, land.

Gift Economy Circles

Scale: Small–medium (5–50) Use: Non-monetary exchange, community bonding

Participants offer skills, objects, or time without expectation of direct return. Surplus circulates.

→ Natural Garden faction practice. Contrast with market-based allocation.

Prediction Markets

Scale: Any Use: Forecasting, collective intelligence

Players buy/sell shares in outcomes ("Will the dam hold?"). Prices reflect collective probability estimates.

→ Gamifies information aggregation. Rewards paying attention to what's actually happening.

Futarchy

Scale: Large Use: Policy selection via markets

"Vote on values, bet on beliefs." The community votes on goals, then prediction markets determine which policies best achieve those goals.

→ Advanced Spaceship Earth mechanic. Deeply weird and fascinating.

Small-Group & Tribal

5 methods

Roles Rotation / Circle Governance

Scale: Small (3–15) Use: Running a working group without hierarchy

Roles (facilitator, note-taker, timekeeper, vibes-checker) rotate each meeting. No permanent leaders.

→ Teaches that leadership is a function, not an identity.

Do-ocracy

Scale: Any Use: Action-biased self-organisation

If you want something done, do it. If you do it, you're in charge of it. No permission needed.

→ Already Burning Man DNA. Interesting to put in explicit tension with other systems.

Advice Process

Scale: Small–large Use: Decentralised decision-making

Anyone can make any decision, but must first seek advice from (a) people affected and (b) people with expertise. Not consensus — the decider still decides.

→ Fast, empowering, but demands accountability.

Council of Elders / Wisdom Council

Scale: Community-wide Use: Long-term perspective, conflict resolution

A small rotating group serves as advisors and mediators. Not executive power — advisory and moral authority only.

→ A counterbalance to populist voting dynamics.

Peacemaking Circle (Restorative Justice)

Scale: Small (3–20) Use: Harm repair, conflict between people or factions

Harmed party, responsible party, and community members sit in circle with a facilitator. Focus on understanding harm, taking responsibility, and agreeing on repair — not punishment.

→ Essential for when conflict gets real. Transforms disputes into story.

Digital-Native & Experimental

4 methods

Holographic Consensus

Scale: Any (digital) Use: Scalable governance for large decentralised groups

Proposals can be made by anyone. Predictors stake tokens on whether the group would approve. Only contested proposals go to full vote.

→ Efficient for high-volume decisions. The prediction layer filters noise.

Retroactive Public Goods Funding

Scale: Community-wide Use: Rewarding contributions after the fact

Instead of funding proposals upfront, evaluate what was actually valuable after a period and reward it retroactively.

→ Flips incentives. People focus on doing good work rather than writing good proposals.

Polis (Computational Democracy)

Scale: Large (50–10,000+) Use: Finding consensus in polarised groups

Participants submit short statements and vote agree/disagree on others' statements. Machine learning clusters opinion groups and surfaces statements with cross-group consensus.

→ Used by Audrey Tang for vTaiwan. Surfaces surprising agreements between factions.

Coordi-nation (Signal-based coordination)

Scale: Any Use: Emergent coordination without central planning

Players signal intentions on a shared board or map. Self-organisation happens through visible information.

→ Low-overhead. Makes collective intelligence visible.

Meta-Systems & Constitutional

4 methods

Constitutional Convention

Scale: Whole community Use: Establishing the rules of governance itself

Delegates draft a foundational charter. Ratification by the broader body.

→ Could be the climactic event — building a planetary constitution using whichever systems participants have learned.

Subsidiarity Principle

Scale: Multi-level Use: Deciding what gets decided where

Decisions should be made at the most local level capable of handling them. Only escalate upward when necessary.

→ Architectural principle for the whole governance stack: personal → team → faction → council → planetary assembly.

Two-House / Bicameral System

Scale: Large Use: Balancing representation models

One chamber represents people proportionally, another represents groups (factions, regions) equally. Both must agree.

→ Ensures small groups aren't steamrolled.

Rotating Facilitation with Mandate

Scale: Medium Use: Time-limited executive authority

A facilitator is empowered for a fixed short term with a specific mandate. Must report back. Cannot self-extend.

→ Safe way to experiment with concentrated power. The mandate expires — what happened?